InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,099.96
(
1.02%
)
US TECH 100
17,242.40
(
1.56%
)
Dow Jones
38,239.66
(
0.40%
)
Brent Oil
88.17
(
0.02%
)
Bitcoin
63,853.38
(
-0.98%
)
Post# of 82575
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

pb_trading

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 256
Posts 18006
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/19/2004

pb_trading

Re: MJAM2020 post# 73001

Wednesday, 04/26/2017 11:30:05 AM

Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:30:05 AM

Post# of 82575
Yes, exactly, if we were shareholders of UMS,LLC shares they would be toast but iTalk Inc. common shareholders. The original process of a Reverse triangular merger keeps all entities separate until final combination, which never happened due to the preferred shares.

It's clear that TALK shares will be unaffected by the UMS,LLC Chapter 11, now what isn't clear is how these entities exist and what they own post Chapter 11.

$TALK

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up