I see you got it
:)
Let's share some funny stuff instead...
"In discovery conducted to date Plaintiff has failed to
quantify or substantiate the vast majority of its purported
damages, despite Defendants’ demands. Instead, Plaintiff has
provided limited, eclectic discovery concerning its claimed out of-pocket
losses while taking the position, in contravention of
well-settled caselaw, that it will produce documents and
disclose the categories, calculations and amounts of its
purported business-related damages as part of its expert
disclosure, notwithstanding the fact that these amounts have
been the subject of various press releases and securities
filings made by Tauriga. These open discovery disputes are the
subject of pending letter applications before Magistrate Judge
Arpert."
