Friday, April 14, 2017 12:25:58 PM
Had the board been more reasonable in its valuation, it would have saved millions of shares for the HITD shareholders. Example: an insider would not have gotten 200 million shares, but instead only 20 million, had the valuation been .001 per share (still half the recent low of .0019). Savings to shareholders: 180 million shares!
And had the valuation been in the .005 range (which I think is an appropriate but still discounted level), the award would only have been 4 million shares -- vastly different than the 200 million that were awarded!
With an appropriate valuation, there would be hundreds of millions of fewer shares outstanding versus the over 900 million currently.
Sorry Charmaine Berry, but you have been way too aggressive in support of JB and the other directors, and there is no justification for it.
This will also likely be the cause of shareholder lawsuits against the BOD too, should the company ever reach some level of quasi-success.
Disappointing for a very long-term holder and supporter of this stock.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM