InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,222.68
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
17,650.00
(
0.05%
)
Dow Jones
39,512.84
(
0.32%
)
Brent Oil
82.59
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,795.01
(
0.00%
)
Post# of 105534
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Myth

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 138
Posts 79685
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/22/2007

Myth

Member Level

Re: MoneyMan post# 101396

Monday, 04/10/2017 1:58:31 PM

Monday, April 10, 2017 1:58:31 PM

Post# of 105534
That's one way to look at it......another would be to look at how many days before Red Oak it traded below .002.....yes, picking .0015 would make my point not as valid.

Anyone can look at historical prices and see plainly between the time time the Tonaquint lawsuit and Red Oak coming in shows NUMEROUS opportunity for an easy double, or better.

Even CCEL was flipping it....

So we don't have to use .0015 and .005 at all......

My point is simple, as with any stock there were ample opportunities to trade the stock.......and as history shows time and time again buying and holding a dilution pig like this over the years was very costly to some.

imo nothing " drastic " has to happen...lol....just going to take a bit more time.

No worries.....
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up