Saturday, March 25, 2017 4:10:02 PM
Perhaps it is something else other than actual ownership of the patents themselves, or perhaps there is some other explanation -- like that the ownership doesn't take effect until after the IPR/nullity proceedings resolve questions of validity. Who knows. Some sort of agreement was filed in the appeal hearing, so I think it's safe to assume that some sort of agreement exists.
Perhaps all will be clarified shortly in the 2016 yearly filing.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM