Saturday, March 25, 2017 4:01:32 PM
He's invited to compare and contrast SPORTS capabilities. IMO
He says, it will do this, this and this. Great.
No red flags. Design and eval unit confirmed and complete.
Software always takes longer than expected.
Which is why they needed to reel in those (speculated) design enhancements.
I've always asked, "Why can't some or most be moved to SPORT 2.0?"
I think Mc concurs.
The IP checks out - except one. Not as good as I'd hoped.
We'll see how this shakes out the rest of this spring and over the summer.
If SPORT is demo'd, we may get a surprise. IDK.
I'm looking at the tech, and capability and see other applications.
Just get this first one done.
JMO
Regards,
BK
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM