InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 435
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/31/2014

Re: BobKS post# 7718

Friday, 03/17/2017 12:50:54 PM

Friday, March 17, 2017 12:50:54 PM

Post# of 8579
I'm hesitant to write "one last thing" here, because it may not turn out to be the case.

The most fascinating piece of the puzzle to me is the situation of Mr. Fife. If he votes his shares in favor of the proposals at the upcoming meeting, it's entirely possible that his shares plus the three executives' shares could put the affirmative vote over the top. If he decides not to vote, or decides to vote in opposition, the gang here may have the best ally imaginable in terms of pursuing legal remedies.

The gang here will also seek to confirm, I would believe, that Mr. Fife had no information available to him that was not available to you all if he had been selling stock during the time that the general stockholder community would claim to have been misinformed regarding the viability of the company. I have no reason to believe that he did anything improper, plus I'm not a lawyer so I wouldn't know it even if he did it. I am just logically of the belief that, presuming his integrity (and there is no reason to believe that a toxic lender has ethics any different from the rest of us), he can be very helpful to your cause.