Saturday, March 11, 2017 11:38:04 AM
So let me ask you what happens if they never do a 43-101?
Without it there is never a payment.
There is never mining and never a smelting royalty.
If it was a sale what value did we get?
ST was an asset that had value on the books.
Let's give it $100 value for the sake of ease.
We gave $100 of asset value and recieved nothing.
The Smelter return and 1 time payment may never happen so what was the company shareholders given in return for their $100?
Did the company just lose the asset value?
I don't think it was a bad thing to do. The company has no money and so the claim would be lost eventually without maintaining fees etc.
It's good Dan unloaded the burden.
But it wasn't a sale till the shareholders get a ROI.
If anything it only proved my point that you don't invest in an asset because management can unload an asset with no notice.
Recent IGEX News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2023 09:09:59 PM
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies Launches New Compact Breath Logix Workplace Series and Prepares for Delivery to South Africa • May 7, 2024 8:51 AM
Moon Equity Holdings, Corp. Announces Acquisition of Wikolo, Inc. • MONI • May 7, 2024 9:48 AM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM