InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 13313
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/10/2013

Re: ricanich post# 37138

Friday, 03/10/2017 7:14:45 PM

Friday, March 10, 2017 7:14:45 PM

Post# of 54031

What's the deal with Herzog leaving a super big firm and going to a small no name firm that does not have a website. Herzog is not a spring chicken, that's for sure.


Is the poster implying that an OLDER PERSON, representing TAUG's adversary in a civil action, is "SO OLD" he/she cannot do an excellent job?

Is the poster suggesting that a smaller law firm, representing TAUG's adversary in a civil action, is "TOO SMALL" to do an excellent job?

What does the "ABSENCE" of a company website have to do with ANYTHING in terms of describing the actual quality of a legal practice? Check it out...hundreds of small law firms have decided a website is superfluous, i.e. NOT NEEDED to enhance their legal practices!

JUST AN FYI...THERE ARE MANY HIGH QUALITY SMALL COMPANIES, RUN BY VERY COMPETENT OLDER FOLKS, WHICH ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE WITH NOT CONSTRUCTING AND MAINTAINING A TRIVIAL WEBSITE TO "HANG" ON THE INTERNET!