JimLur you're swimming in funky fairyland territory in which there often seems a competition in which conspiracy is concocted about anything and everything in the hope that one day some evidence may catch up to support the concoction.
Doug Hagmann isn't exactly a reliable guy. Here's another example.
- Steve Quayle Exposes Doug Hagmann’s NSA Targeting Allegation is Fake … Updated 19 November 2014 41 Comments Important update. Scroll down in RED
Normally in journalism you correct yourself in 48-72 hours. In this case, it has been more than 30 days since I reported my National Security Agency (NSA) correction story. Since then none of the principals have corrected anything with me or apologized to their own audiences.
The decline of Tim Ball: Denier champion reduced to railing at real scientists .. bit .. So now Dr. Ball is left with a dwindling audience, writing his weekly column in the little-known libertarian website Canada Free Press. There .. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/9746 , recently, he set upon doctors James Hansen and Andrew Weaver, two of the most respected climate scientists on the continent. Both of these men have published more peer-reviewed research in a single season than Ball wrote in his entire career. Both have gained the respect and admiration of their professional colleagues and both are prominent contributors to the Nobel quality work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=114935948
remember some twit that used to post here from that trash rag so called canada free press site ?...well, LOLOL. .....And then told us that Canadians agreed with it ? .....WELL... Canadians reject FOX propaganda http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=60473653
Todd, Outside of the fact that were able to read the headline, is there anything in the article that John Holdren is involved in anything at all besides disagreeing with Baliunas and Soon. I followed up your link and found it was really just a link to the Canada Free Press article you posted earlier. Will your next posting simply refer back to this one referring back to the Canada Free Press article you posted earlier? Aren't you really just spamming the board with more of your white supremacist hatred of Obama crap? What is your understanding of the climate change debate? I have to tell you, your posts seem a little screechy and insubstantial. And your commentary on them is non existent. All I get from you is, "Look here, this ultra right wing white supremacist hates Obama." And "Look here, this ultra right wing white supremacist hates Obama too. Whatta ya know? Lots of right wing white supremacists hate him! Must mean somethin', eh?" Got anything else? Let me say in advance, "Didn't think so." http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=43963057
It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.