InvestorsHub Logo

nfp

Followers 2
Posts 196
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2014

nfp

Re: nfp post# 239

Monday, 03/06/2017 12:44:03 PM

Monday, March 06, 2017 12:44:03 PM

Post# of 342
OK--i finished reading the opinion.
Looks like the judge was not in any way disposed against PRZM for their damages claim, KOmani.
Also looks like the logical conclusion for remaining defendants on these patents will be to settle with PRZM rather than taking their chances against the precedent of 2 substantial settlements.
Meanwhile, I'm assuming that this was written so tightly that Sprint cannot appeal En Banc or to the Supremes--but please correct me if i'm wrong about that. So even after the latest dilution based on the loan, I'm looking at PRZM trading at quite a bit under 50% of their net cash position after payments to the original Prism entity (no taxes due on the settlement as they're protected by the NOL's and a lot more to come there also). With considerable prospects ahead for more settlements on these patents, plus a war chect to enforce the other patents. So while the company is worth $1.50 to $2 based on its cash I still think a $3 valuation is totally reasonable based on go forward opportunity. I'd say HOLD.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.