InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 73
Posts 9049
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2010

Re: sandman70000 post# 19977

Friday, 03/03/2017 9:34:29 AM

Friday, March 03, 2017 9:34:29 AM

Post# of 24536
Uh, isn't that reversing the burden of proof ?

If ELGL is a a public company, and performs an acquisition or a merger, then it must disclose the terms to its shareholders:

When did the acquisition took place, who signed, what company was acquired, what were the term, how many shares were issued, what assets were acquired, what are the current operations, if any. ???????

All those questions have been left unanswered, months after the purported "acquisition" took place.
And that's with a "company" that claim to have been immensely profitable selling strawberries, but suddenly decided to "sell" all its imaginary operations (at a price that they didn't bother to reveal), and then has stayed idle for 2 (3?) years, busy performing "due diligence" on an "acquisition" they cannot tell anything about, except that the target company happens to have the same name as them.

Right.