Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[bkshadow]

FDIC, YES, Supplemental OP...

...so, what ONE FDIC.

...disclosure which is not FACTUAL?

...just ONE.

...consequently, there again is concurred agreement.

...again, there has been not ONE link to the document would help, or an image; and of course, a detailed explanation by equally credentialed support of what FACT not ONE such FDIC disclosure is purported to be incorrect.

...so, unless presented, it is still correctly and factually, as has been and will continue to be, referencing the FACTS for both the WMILT and the FDIC leads to the conclusions of the MAX $78M+- for the waterfall (drippings) to escrows.

...the WMILT will eventually wind down and close and that will the END of the theories on a broad coastal wave of 'FINDINGS of billions, tens of billions, hundreds of billions and even trillions with NOTHING FROM THE FDIC ("directly or indirectly" regarding the nonsensical theory of billions, tens of billions, hundreds of billions and even trillions asserted to be OFF-BALANCE (as in SAFE HARBOR)).

...again, and like the WMILT, the FDIC has the credentialed regulators and third party professionals, the Liquidating Trustee, the LT Advisory Board, etc. support the foundation of FACT.

...and like the WMILT, the FDIC alt-theories based on omission of FACTS, as a challenge to prove-the-negative 'doesn't exist, is subject to the same by such; i.e., the FDIC disclosures (and COURT CASES) are FACTUAL in "not reporting" such nonsense.

wowalters Friday, 02/24/17 08:16:39 AM
Re: bkshadow post# 472620
Post #
472622
of 472630 Go
Has the FDIC presented ALL the facts?