InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 4234
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/22/2010

Re: wowalters post# 472621

Friday, 02/24/2017 10:00:41 AM

Friday, February 24, 2017 10:00:41 AM

Post# of 727630
WMILT, YES, as indicated in OP...

...and note, nothing has been pointed out; not ONE WMILT...

...filing which is not FACTUAL?

...not ONE.

...so, clearly, there agreement; thanks..

...again, there has been not ONE link to the document would help, or an image; and of course, a detailed explanation by equally credentialed support of what FACT not ONE such WMILT filing is purported to be incorrect.

...so, correctly and factually, as has been and will continue to be, referencing the FACTS leads to the conclusions of the MAX $78M+- for the waterfall (drippings) to escrows.

...the WMILT will eventually wind down and close and that will the END of the theories on a broad coastal wave of 'FINDINGS of billions, tens of billions, hundreds of billions and even trillions.

...again, the WMILT, the credentialed professionals, the Liquidating Trustee, the LT Advisory Board, etc. support the foundation of FACT.

...and omission of FACTS, as a challenge to prove-the-negative 'doesn't exist, is subject to the same by such; i.e., the filings are FACTUAL in "not reporting" such nonsense.



wowalters Friday, 02/24/17 08:12:44 AM
Re: bkshadow post# 472620
Post #
472621
of 472630 Go
Has the WMILT presented ALL the facts?








Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News