InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 179
Posts 35377
Boards Moderated 20
Alias Born 04/17/2013

Re: Meow D itchy Kitty post# 360808

Friday, 02/24/2017 9:46:40 AM

Friday, February 24, 2017 9:46:40 AM

Post# of 380511
The high, back in 2013, was 0.1783 at the old, pre-reverse split PPS.

Adjusting for the 1:25.1 reverse split, that is $4.48 at today's dilution level.

That's a 99.4 PERCENT LOSS in 3.5 years.

And the answer to the question: "What does one have to lose now?" The answer is of course whatever the remainder of the initial investment(s) still exist.

Unless one would happily take a match and burn $500 cash, why would anyone lett $500 in an account CONtinue to vanish to ZERO?

Sunk costs fallacy.

Averaging down to zero is a proven 100 percent lose plan - and it's the most commonly executed 'strategy' for pennyscamvestors to follow. It's a psychological error - avoidance of facing the reality of having been utterly wrong and realizing the loss. So this averaging down to zero strategy just delays the pain butt at a growing LOSS and a bigger ultimate pain.