InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2010

Re: Jayyy post# 8815

Wednesday, 02/22/2017 8:24:57 PM

Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:24:57 PM

Post# of 13735
You state: "This is a very serious YIELD and to say other wise flies in the face of FACTS. THE FACT IS this definition comes from OTC--not me."
Really? I looked through the OTC reporting requirements and I did not see anywhere a definition of a "serious yield". While the description below appears to be taken from OTC guidelines, the yield sign is placed if quarterly information is not submitted within 45 days of quarter end (so it is late) but previous quarters filed within the past 6 months
"Designates companies with financial reporting problems, in economic distress, or bankruptcy, that make limited information publicly available. This category also includes companies that may not be troubled, but are unwilling to provide disclosure to Pink Basic Disclosure Guidelines. "

You also state falsely that "This scam with $147 in the bank has no UNAUDITED reports for over 6 months!!! "
FACT is that by OTC guidelines, the quarterly report ending 12/31/16 was due on about 2/15/17 which makes the report 8 days late. Your statement that no reports are filed for over 6 months is verifiably false proven by the filing date of 11/24/16 for the quarter ending 9/30/16. Note that it is not even 5 months since the end of the 9/30/16 quarter and less than 3 months since the previously filed results. Indeed if it had been over 6 months a stop sign would be present, which it is not.

I suggest taking more care to actually check so called "FACTS" to avoid misleading readers to a predetermined false conclusion of "scammers and co-conspirators" based on verifiably false information.