InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 74
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/21/2016

Re: None

Wednesday, 02/22/2017 3:09:46 PM

Wednesday, February 22, 2017 3:09:46 PM

Post# of 19672
So it appears the numbers I used on my earlier post of 2000 tons per well will be very conservative. Other articles I've read indicate that 5000 tons may be more common with some wells using up to 30,000 tons.
The article I just posted indicates a looming shortage of frac sand and potential logistics issues surrounding deliver. NAFS appears to be located in a perfect location to solve both these issues for the Alberta, Saskatchewan, and the Bakken demand.
I previously mentioned the potential demand in Alberta, it appears that Saskatchewan also has a huge potential demand for fracking. The Saskatchewan provincial government is also very supportive of this type of activity, both the development of the frac sand resource and oil exploration.
When the 43-101 is announced, I wonder if, as the previous article indicated, if NAFS could commence talks with potential customers for long term supply contracts.
NAFS could be on the edge of a perfect storm. Shortage of sand supply, increasing sand demand, close proximity the immense market, potentially favourable transportation logistics and a supportive governmental jurisdiction.
We just need more news to get this pony running.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NAFS News