Does the appeals court think that arms. as in right to bear arms, means that there must be an elbow?
Are citizens supposed to defend our liberty with a pellet gun, while the government has 50 calibers?
The court says: “Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war” that the Supreme Court’s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly excluded from such coverage.
You wouldn't be trying to put the shuck on me, would ya stranger?
As I often get told, step aside son, you're a blockin' the MOMO!