InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2010

Re: HopScotch2 post# 8810

Monday, 02/20/2017 10:47:51 PM

Monday, February 20, 2017 10:47:51 PM

Post# of 13735
You state 'How about those "free trading shares" hitting the market'
Since the assertion is false as any can verify from the publicly available share issuance data, how about some backup for that accusation?

You further state "dilution like what has occurred in ROTH really stings investors"
Really? Every bit of stock issued has been accounted for. As I have repeatedly posted, unaudited financials are available since 2012. See below for the information available for any that want to know facts about the company. I have posted it and questioned why ROTH should be held to a different standard than any other company that posts unaudited results and therefore is on otcmarkets.

Name date and price paid along with other required information are listed for shares sold or issued for services in each quarterly supplemental for the 2 years prior. I note that since the 2012 annual report (earliest listed filing on otcmarkets.com) which lists back to 4/15/2010, just before ROTH purchased Sucanon rights from BIOHF and Rieveley family, when 127,500,000 shares were outstanding, all share sales and prices have been listed up to the current period. Let's be clear that what is required and what other companies do is release ongoing sales for the 2 years prior in the filings. What others have asked is to list information for ALL shares outstanding, which would include any sales and public trading since inception of a trading market for ROTH shares, which is not done by any company period. That is why despite me identifying this issue and challenging the clearly unreasonable request, there has been no posting of any example listed company that actually lists in real time all sales, prices, and owners.
What really appears to sting investors is the posting of verifiably false information about the company and product. If the situation were that dire, there would be no need to manufacture false information to embellish in an attempt to 'prove' a predetermined false conclusion.