Monday, February 20, 2017 12:54:31 PM
At the current production rates and price of oil the gross revenues for the month with oil at $53 would be $9,275. I doubt ERHC would net 50% of that after royalties, severance taxes, operating costs and marketing costs. But let's say they net $5000 a month. They paid about $500,000. That would indicate a 100 month payback. Would you spend over half of your remaining cash to get repaid over 8 years? I sure wouldn't.
Even if they plan on drilling a well there, which they don't have the money to do, I don't think the payback on that well would be much better than on this one. So, why did ERHC do this? Or was it just a transfer of the remaining cash?
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM