Monday, February 20, 2017 12:54:31 PM
At the current production rates and price of oil the gross revenues for the month with oil at $53 would be $9,275. I doubt ERHC would net 50% of that after royalties, severance taxes, operating costs and marketing costs. But let's say they net $5000 a month. They paid about $500,000. That would indicate a 100 month payback. Would you spend over half of your remaining cash to get repaid over 8 years? I sure wouldn't.
Even if they plan on drilling a well there, which they don't have the money to do, I don't think the payback on that well would be much better than on this one. So, why did ERHC do this? Or was it just a transfer of the remaining cash?
Recent ERHE News
- Form SC 13G - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/06/2024 07:31:22 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/08/2023 09:06:42 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/28/2023 05:35:35 PM
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM