Well, I will try to find the post where you thought Seth was in on it and benefitted from the Cowan arrangement. I did not say rules had anything to do with your post, in the past you stated that the rules I cited Cowan violated did not exist. I simply was showing you where to find the rules that are the basis of TAUG's negligence suit against above and beyond the failure to rotate.
No need to get in a tizzy, I thought I was providing you information you wanted.
As far as the note it will most likely be PART OF THE INSURANCE CLAIM. After all, TAUG is still damaged to this day. They have not been made whole as they were listed on the OTCQB prior to OTC markets removing them as a result of the SEC deeming the audit unlawful.
I don't think Group 10 even offered TAUG any financing until around that date in 2016. I think they did it because Seth had raised quite a bit of money and had some momentum in terms of getting TAUG back on track as a fully reporting company. Seth achieved another milestone that is significant by getting TAUG DECN eligible.
What do you mean what is in it for Seth Shaw. Are you alleging something illegal or a kickback, if so why don't you state that rather than beat around the bush.
I have watched how hard Seth worked and sacrificed and he has done so with no compensation from TAUG.
Do you think that the terms and the loan was originated on July 14th or do you think that loan origination started well before that date. I think it started well before that date. What does the formal date have to do with anything, do you know how many times Group 10 notified TAUG of the default?
