InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 2035
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2012

Re: rl71852 post# 165668

Saturday, 02/18/2017 6:40:51 PM

Saturday, February 18, 2017 6:40:51 PM

Post# of 173188
It's hard to cipher that as written.

It seems like you are saying: 'A bad assay on the core would have been very bad for NAK, therefore they forgave the loan in order to get control of the core and prevent the release of assay results'.

I suppose that is possible, but I don't buy (no pun) it. More plausible to me is that they liked what they saw and forgiving the loan was an ounce of quick easy prevention for future headaches from interlopers, not controlling the larger area, and so forth - they had a lot of leverage.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News