Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[Johnny_C]

TAUG is being run by a person with a rumored substance problem, and arguably that is not the most negative character flaw in his checkered past.

Who has a rumored substance substance abuse problem? Who tells you these false rumors?

Its "consultant," the puppeteer behind the puppet CEO, has spent some time in jail for threatening children (in writing), ignoring a series of court orders, and then threatening a superior court judge.

What consultant spent time in jail for threatening children, prove that. IF you are referring to me I wrote a Family Court judge that she was ignoring child abuse and insulted her. my allegations were supported by DCYF. A First Amendment right, by the way. A nit wit Superior Court judge decided to be a big shot and hold me in criminal contempt for insulting a judge, without notice, right to a lawyer, rights against self incrimination or rights to a jury, it was overturned. That judge ended up recusing himself from the case and then abruptly retiring. I didn't threaten him I sued him. What does this have to do with TAUG? IF Cowan or DECN are basing the defense of lawsuits based on this defense they are going to be very shocked when the actual transcripts are produced.

this consultant intervened in TAUG's lawsuit against its former auditor by communicating with a Federal court judge and bullying her.

How was a federal judge bullied by receiving a letter informing the Court that Cowan and Meyler intentionally failed to reveal in sworn affidavits the relationship they had with the Florida office of Cherry Bakeart, who worked as basically a sub contractor on TAUG's 2014 audit at the behest of Cowan Gutenski. The 2014 audit is the basis of TAUG's lawsuit against Owen Gutenski.

Nor are the CEOs past (and sad) associations, including the association with the arguably criminal association with the rogue SpongeTech.

How does the TAUG's CEO investment, along with 73 other investors, give him a criminal association with Sponge Tech. SPongetech was a high profile high flying company. The only sad association he has had that I know of is with the CEO of DECN, Keith Berman.

TAUG has 4-5 message board vigilantes who are spending 24/7, at the behest (and probably payment) by the TAUG CEO

TAUG does not have any paid posters, prove it.

Now TAUG is resorting to extortion.

Who or what entity is TAUG extorting?

Almost half have been issued so that the CEO could prosecute his hopeless lawsuit, overpay auditors, and attack unassociated third party officers and directors of an unaffiliated company.

What facts do you have to support the lawsuit is hopeless? OR that shares have been issued to attack unassociated third party officers of an unaffiliated company, name the COMPANY and who has been given shares to attack it.

I post once a day on this message board, and the vigilantes

Why, a restriction?

Oh, and by the way, TAUG, its CEO, its "consultant" and the message board vigilantes are being sued by this unaffiliated company for libel and Internet stalking.

Let's get the party started so the truth will come out. Who is suing DECN? the depositions of Lyons, Berman, Jag a donut, and Belcher should make a great read for TAUG shareholders.

TAUG also has bet the ranch on a hopeless lawsuit against a former auditor who admitted to its faults in a public setting.

Last I read the auditor stated he did nothing wrong and was thrown under the bus by the PCAOB even though he clearly violated the rules. so this statement is another falsehood. This auditor violated about 10 rules of the AICPA rules of conduct. Like the judge, he conveniently retired.

Tomorrow I plan to explore the illegal sweetheart deals given to the consultant to invest small amounts of what is now conflicted money, and of course those death spiral financings.

It's tomorrow, let's hear about the illegal sweetheart deals given to the consultant. Provide details of the illegal deal and the name of the consultant this illegal sweetheart deal was given to.


How are you affiliated with DECN?