InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 408
Posts 58829
Boards Moderated 15
Alias Born 05/01/2010

Re: Jahvik post# 35875

Saturday, 02/18/2017 11:59:12 AM

Saturday, February 18, 2017 11:59:12 AM

Post# of 38595
Correct, it's irresponsible, at best, for SHOM to distribute PRs which are not based on FACT. It merely proves them to be malfeasant. Just the fact that Coca-Cola East Japan said the first PR was a lie is a huge red flag. That SHOM issued a followup is immaterial, since the stock was clearly pumped, then dumped on what SHOM either knew, or should have known, was false. That's more than malfeasance, it's securities fraud.

Facts are facts and usually can only be verified after the fact.
Calling something a fact without any evidence of it being a fact is irresponsible.