Dr. Rojas, a non public figure, is repeatedly smeared with false information, and information shown to be false continues to be repeated. The Sucanon clinical study results are available for anyone to see in the EASD journal in the case of the Latino prediabetic study. How about some actual scientific evidence for these ongoing claims and for example your previous post " Also the "study" is in a long list of "clinical trials" by the company that have also been challenge for efficacy. They include, Tehran, Brazil and China. "
There is no evidence that the studies have been challenged. On the contrary, the preclinical testing and double blind placebo controlled 6 month study in which Sucanon outperformed Glyburide was reviewed by the Mexican and Peruvian governments and formed the basis for approval of Sucanon. In fact for all your misrepresentation of an FDA ban, FDA states in their response letter:
1. Sucanon is considered a drug per the food and drug act
2. Sucanon has been subject to "substantial clinical investigations" directly citing the published studies
3. They did not review safety and efficacy data at all
4. Sucanon would have to be submitted as an investigational new drug application
In addition, your implication in a long ago post that you found information on Sucanon from a list of criminal investigations, that information has been debunked, as has the modified Consumer Reports article that was falsely made to appear that the company was warned for illegal marketing.
As a reminder, I post publicly verifiable information to back up each and every one of my claimed facts.
