PharmaRoth Labs, Inc. (ROTH)

[sweetlou]

You state "Wrong. There is NO independent peer review for this insider scam"

1. The comment is very sloppy as well as being inaccurate.
2.. The peer review process was conducted by experts at EASD who included the Sucanon study in 97 Latino prediabetics in the 2013 annual meeting presentations and in their peer reviewed journal.
3. From Merriam Webster:
peer review
: a process by which something proposed (as for research or publication) is evaluated by a group of experts in the appropriate field
4. Note that I actually provide a reference and backup information to supplement my actual expertise.
5. Your definition of "clinical peer review" is misapplied as the evaluation of health care professionals performance is undertaken when an unexpected complication or bad outcome occurs during patient care and the diagnosis and treatment are reviewed to determine if care was adequate or established systems or protocols should be changed in the facility where that care is provided. The quote "the process by which health care professionals evaluate each other's clinical performance" has nothing to do with the peer review process conducted during performance of clinical research as I have outlined and referenced above. I note that your information is unreferenced so those without knowledge of the actual process can check or actually understand the inaccuracy of your comment.