Followers | 293 |
Posts | 4644 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 10/12/2008 |
Sunday, January 29, 2017 11:35:11 PM
For this exercise, each draw or annual total does not have to be presented in separate loans, the math gets you to the exact same spot regardless of presentation.
That exercise is fine. It is a personal exercise.
The bill's provisions require separate loans. Why? Ask Capuano. If it passed, as is, separate loans will be made with provisions of 5% interest rate over the entire term of the loan, a 30 year maturity, an amortization schedule over 30 years, and GSE dividends paid counted as principal and interest payments beginning with the first loan originated by date as stated and directed in the bill and added to subsuquent loans. Is that not so in the bill as given?
On the basis of loan - v draw and repayment my presentation is sound.
See presentation: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128245099
Yes. It is sound for what it is.
However, it is not what the bill requires and cannot be used to evaluate H.R. 491 which is the exercise for this thread.
jeddiemack, what is it about the bill that it cannot be evaluated on its own terms as clearly stated.
For instance, what is the reason to not make separate loans with on a 30 year amortization schedule at 5% percent interest when the bill requires it?
The bill's provisions state that separate loans are be originated on the date of the last draw during a year when the draws are made and wherein the principal obligation for the loan is in an amount equal to the aggregate amount of such draws for that year with a 30 year maturity at 5% for the entire term of the loan and placed on a amortization schedule over such term to maturity and repaid according to that amortization schedule and Paragraph (3)?
Is it difficult or impossible to use A, B, C, D, E, F, and Paragraph (3) to construct a presentation, rather than a personal presentation that does not follow the bill's provisions?
The simple amortization schedule in the bill refers to what is seen below.
Payment # - Payment Amount - Principal - Interest - Balance
What the amortization schedule schedule would be like in terms of the number of payments over thirty years is unknown. The bill does not make that clear. Certainly, different amortization schedules with different number of payments over the maturity of the loan yield different results. As you know, prepayment, overpayment rules are not provided in the bill.
Source:
H.R. 491
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/491/text
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM