Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:32:31 PM
The research that was previously posted by JPS02 adds to the ”validity” of what we have here with TXTM (PLPL). In my opinion, TXTM is like a OWCP, SGBY, and CGRW all wrapped up into one. The key with TXTM is that they already have the infrastructure in place to do marijuana cultivation, marijuana laboratory, marijuana clinical trials, medical marijuana, etc. because of PLPL being their Parent Company controlling them.
These are some huge agencies and companies that you posted from their website of which they had previously conducted Clinical Trials with of which these Clinical Trials were very successful. Below are the results from the Clinical Trials that were conducted with Sunkist, USDA, and ChromaDex (CDXC:NASDAQ) for those who have not learned of this yet to confirm the legitimacy of the company:
Sunkist is a company that I think we all are familiar with that has generated over $1 Billion in Revenues for 6 (six) consecutive years:
https://www.sunkist.com/press-room/sunkist-growers-announces-sixth-straight-billion-dollar-revenue-year-and-second-consecutive-billion-dollar-grower-payment/
https://www.sunkist.com/
ChromaDex trades on the NASDAQ at over $2.80+ per share with an over $109 Million Market Cap:
https://www.chromadex.com/
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA):
https://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128001478
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128025299
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128031986
mymonies, with these significant TXTM thoughts…
I agree with your thoughts. Doing it this way allows for PLPL to not lose or be hit if things don’t work out because TXTM will eventually be judged on its own merits whether they sink or swim.
However, if things turn out to be as big as they believe, which is why they went down this path in the first place, then PLPL will gain twice as much since they are the Parent Company for TXTM.
The difference between most of the MJ stocks versus TXTM is that most of the MJ stocks operate with only having the reach from its single regulated state only. Now, with TXTM, they are operationally structured to have the reach for an entire country. The TXTM position for expansion is far greater in my opinion.
v/r
Sterling
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128032014
Key TXTM & PLPL Connecting Variables
Below from the TXTM Investor’s page, the company has very clearly laid out the TXTM & PLPL Connecting Variables:
http://www.protextm.co/investors
v/r
Sterling
v/r
Sterling
Sterling's Trading & Investing Strategies:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=39092516
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM