InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 3408
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2016

Re: None

Friday, 01/20/2017 2:17:51 PM

Friday, January 20, 2017 2:17:51 PM

Post# of 233278
Being mired in the past is dangerous, particularly when the past was fraught with despair and angst. To dwell on it is self-defeating. To harbor the resentment is particularly damaging. Time to move on from the issue of the departed CEO and move on to what's important - the new CEO and what he does, or does not, bring to the table.

A differing point of view is vastly different than indifference. It's a colossal waste of time to continue referencing the old CEO. He went bye-bye. The door closed behind him and that's it. Era over.

"Bias" is removed when there is indifference. Indifference and bias are antonyms. Not giving a care about the prior CEO at this point is being indifferent to an era gone by and moving on to a new era. Perhaps the "bias" is more towards embracing the new CEO and forgetting what the old one did, or did not, do. If that is what bias is, then consider me "biased" - towards the new CEO. The old one is gone. That's over with. Failure to reference what's important - the new CEO - is counterproductive because dwelling on what was, fails to recognize what could be. What could be is what is important now, not what was, and 300% plus returns for many people are the facts of the change to a new CEO.

Time to move on. And if you can't move on with the new CEO, then maybe it's time to move out.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News