InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 374
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/27/2010

Re: dude iligence post# 5331

Friday, 01/20/2017 10:22:17 AM

Friday, January 20, 2017 10:22:17 AM

Post# of 6773
That's not relevant to valuation. You don't know what the terms of the deal were. You don't know what, if any, exit price anyone has in mind. At no time has Zac ever talked about the price of the stock after it passed $2.00 per share. He only talks about revenue and sales goals.

Shorts are welcome to step up and increase volume. They will be met with buyers at prices that make sense to buyers. As I said long ago, it's expensive to me. But I don't predict the future. I have 70 shares on the table at this time. And I value that $560 as much as I valued over 50 grand, my profit here. I fully intend to increase my position and I'll be sure to time-stamp it for you when I do. Right now, I have taxes galore to pay, and not just from HLIX.

If the stock goes down, you have not made a case for a scam. Correlation is not causation. Obesity rates have gone up at about the same time telephone poles went up, and both have increased accordingly. The two are unrelated.

Your scam hypothesis has been set up as a false, invalid experiment. Right now, shorts aren't choosing to increase the volume on HLIX. You, yourself, are more than welcome to go short a million shares on this stock. I'm sure you will find buyers all the way down to $1.00. In fact, you would be doing me a favor. And then you can cover to me. Valuation is a mutually exclusive topic.

Remember, according to Jennifer of Cannabase, it was Jennifer that approached Zac. Not the other way around. It's your position that she walked into Zac's office and he said to himself,"Oh, there's somebody I can scam. I'm glad I didn't have to come to her to scam her, but she came to me so I can scam her."

When sentiment is in the toilet, like it was at .80 when I presented this wonderful investment opportunithy to Alan, I'm interested. I love angry shareholders. Like at BBRY, I'm loving the negative sentiment there. At HLIX, we have high sentiment. Not my comfort zone. But that has nothing to do with Zac's integrity. I do not question anyone's integrity here.

You are trying to make the case that good business decision makers (because these are the mose succesfful in the MJ industry) are making bad decisions when it comes to making deals with HLIX> And you have no idea what the deal was. Illogical and completely unrelated to HLIX stock price.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.