There are rules, they seem simple enough but sometimes people do not understand them.
I think the puppet and website was brought up today, I don't think it went over well for Cowan. In fact, the Court may have liked it, go figure.
Looks like our favorite consultant understood the exemption rules better than others.
1. Cowan was forced to transfer the working papers by the mediator who was taking it to the judge.
2. I guess any Johnny come lately can blab things on the internet eh. Now I think you have seen that in two courts.
I guess it is safe to say he does not have to worry about unintended legal consequences. I hear the latest letter is from the new acting Director, intersting
Luckily no time or money was wasted. Looks like the case was transferred and the parties agreed to 6 month extension, which is pretty customary
Actually it was Don Cowan that stated that in the deposition. Looks like another Court may have told Cowan to pound sand on confidentiality. But if you read the transcript and view the exhibits it is clear that once the insurance company was involved the lawyers were telling Cowan to not transfer working papers. If there were any limitations with regard to the working papers Cowan should have documented them in writing and forwarded them to the new auditor. But there were no limitations. it is great to be satisfied but here I think it is quibbling about facts with little import of distinction.
I don't think conjecture like " I don't believe that it does" will matter in court, the fact is it does exist and added a cool half mil to the tab.
High prices, the Cherry Bakeart thing a maging...mostly high prices
why would he back away from it? this seems to confuse Seth with TAUG's ex Board member
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.