InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: 100% CORRECT DD post# 297089

Wednesday, 01/18/2017 10:37:38 AM

Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:37:38 AM

Post# of 312015
my reference to smacking mgmt upside the head is specific to P2O's
website and when last updated re: Shareholder Updates .. note filings
are current


P2O was *wrested* back in mid August 2013 .. analytics always helps
if NF was to be shut down then .. that potential made total sense to me
particularly the conservation of capital and maintaining P2O's beyond
enviable SS .. which creates angst for those who do illegally manipulate
OTC stox like PTOI as this OTC SURVIVOR enters her 9th year as a pubco :)

i could also understand after flagship's eval in the Fall of 2013
by *various entities*
that going the route of an external sales and marketing made total sense
as well as firing those who padded their own pockets at the expense of
every actual P2O investor

housekeeping was checked off .. hence the *hire* of the CFO in March 2014

and in the summer of 2014 .. 2 events *factually* came to pass

public domain's awareness of OBG and multi year permits issued by NYSDEC

the 2nd almost caused CEs' to lose 20c (one of the 5 price points imo
worth noting)


the 5 price points .. CEs have on their books for PTOI *imo* are
5c/10c/20c/35c and of course the last time PTOI was *orchestrated* UP
4 years ago this month .. the biggie noted contemporaneously 1.50 - 1.65

seemingly with ECO's inability to successfully close P2O's first sale
in a time line allotted .. mgmt changed course and went *direct* 2015/2016


now all with interest can argue the pros and cons of internal vs external sales for P2O's processors


my POV hasn't deviated .. selling a disruptive tech in an emerging sector
isn't like selling a 20c widget .. P2O's first sale will be the most difficult and imo most likely the most time consuming

specifically because P2O doesn't control every aspect from start to finish

which is why all with interest could see realistic time lines undertaken
re: the state of Indiana's announcement @ the EO Nov 2016

to say nothing of the monies *anticipated* to be expended .. oh my

that is one site .. in one state .. in one country

clearly based on the *FACT* that PTOI had the lowest YTD *volume* in 2016
i am not alone in the belief that P2O's best days are ahead of her
all this with PTOI's most *compressed* PPS .. since first *trading* (2009)

what this actual P2O investor was looking for out of current mgmt
was the clue pertaining to NF coming back on line or being sold


EOY 2016 Update .. gave me what i was looking for ..

btw .. i applaud RH for a few things .. not the least of which is
his infusion of $Million$ .. which keeps the doors open .. P2O *compliant*
and the total lack of rumors

like many other P2O investors .. i can *wait* out the *outcome* :)

patiently ..

4kids









10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --