My opinion, of the words by John Bourque, ring true to me as the reason the military did not take a strong examination into the Kryron armor of Bourque Industries.
As for now, I stand by my interpretation of a changing of the guard that will question the 2011-2012 decisions to black-list our company for military ballistic plates, both personal and vehicle.
I'll suggest that the law enforce community was alerted to Bourque Industries not being in favor, as in not being trusted for military use, and that caused them to back away from Bourque Industries.
John Bourque can of course give more information on this, either now in tweets or later if Bourque Industries starts to communicate with the shareholders.
Its understood that most shareholders have a "Not much faith in the recent tweets from JB." based on no sales since 2011 and the total lack of status updates from Bourque Industries when each annual financial report has the same "Testing in progress." without any follow-up.
I'm amazed of shareholders holding a 99% lost to justify a 99% distrust of John Bourque based on what appears to be all those at Bourque Industries these past two years to move this company to viability.
Lets take the stand that Kryron is for real, and the armor so demonstrated shows that we have a superior product. If John Bourque wanted to rip away from the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders their ownership in this company he would have already executed a plan once he was released from prison when by all accounts this company was dead in the water.
Here lies my reasoning to load up on BORKs.
Perhaps John Bourque will tweet "Drink the milk."
:)
The posts contained on my (gotmilk) account are my own opinions and are not recommendations or advise to buy or sell any security, stocks or other investments. These posts are for entertainment purposes only and are not considered to be facts or truth.
