Tuesday, January 17, 2017 2:02:59 PM
If there's sufficient interest, and the Articles permit it, shareholders should consider what changes they'd like to implement and have it voted on at an Extraordinary Shareholders meeting. There'd have to be sufficient votes to achieve quorum.
Management is supposed to run the company and generate good returns on the investments made. Its up to the trading market to generate and sustain ongoing liquidity for the tradeable float. There's a disconnect between the two groups.
To digress:
My observation over time is that UCPA Management have generated sustained and increasing revenues in the tens of millions of dollar range, but the operation is still marginal from an investment perspective.
OTC traders at various points in time have tried to generate interest, but their vision is too short-sighted and too limited to allow UCPA to flourish as a liquid ticker. That's a shame since the Company doesn't dilute like so many tickers do.
Question for a ESM:
- What would you like to see as outcomes?
The paradox of iHub: buy high, sell low
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement AI-Empowered, Zero Trust Architecture in Its Data Centers • AVAI • Apr 29, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM