InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 194
Posts 18521
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2010

Re: flyboy8 post# 13820

Tuesday, 01/17/2017 2:02:59 PM

Tuesday, January 17, 2017 2:02:59 PM

Post# of 39094
There's no sense in meeting to request answers to questions. You do that before deciding to meet.

If there's sufficient interest, and the Articles permit it, shareholders should consider what changes they'd like to implement and have it voted on at an Extraordinary Shareholders meeting. There'd have to be sufficient votes to achieve quorum.

Management is supposed to run the company and generate good returns on the investments made. Its up to the trading market to generate and sustain ongoing liquidity for the tradeable float. There's a disconnect between the two groups.

To digress:
My observation over time is that UCPA Management have generated sustained and increasing revenues in the tens of millions of dollar range, but the operation is still marginal from an investment perspective.

OTC traders at various points in time have tried to generate interest, but their vision is too short-sighted and too limited to allow UCPA to flourish as a liquid ticker. That's a shame since the Company doesn't dilute like so many tickers do.

Question for a ESM:
- What would you like to see as outcomes?

The paradox of iHub: buy high, sell low