Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:01:32 PM
Not real important but I'd like to know the how's and why's of the SAB as it is currently selected for Titan. I have a feeling this was an idea of someone on the board, or JH or RR way back when. We were all impressed with the list of names ("Wow!. Titan has its own SAB!") but practically speaking, aside from Valvo's visibility, have ANY of them EVER been involved in ANYTHING related to SPORT? If not, I'd say drop the whole SAB and concentrate on developing (and appointing) surgeon or institutional relationships that DIRECTLY have something to do with SPORT development or testing. And put that on the website.
I'd rather have one or two surgeons and one or two institutions listed as officers or co-developers in the company rather than a dozen far-flung and minimally involved individuals.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM