InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 854
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/02/2009

Re: goodword88 post# 42994

Friday, 01/13/2017 2:12:01 PM

Friday, January 13, 2017 2:12:01 PM

Post# of 52074
GoodWord – what you propose is logical, has been discussed before, and represents a real economic risk to MZEI shareholders. Without sharing in service model revenue, MZEI will make a few bucks selling the AS units and the service provider will take in a haul providing the service. Due to his inability to raise funds, Ed effectively sold the economic value of serving five S. American countries for $2MM, plus warrants. Should the technology prove effective, particularly if the required protocols are of long duration, GYD will stand to make a lot of money over time while MZEI makes very little. Read the agreement with GYD. IMO, should the service model be the appropriate business model, and I think it is, MZEI should be not only setting pricing for the service, they should be sharing in the revenue stream. So far, the deals Ed has cut don’t result in the development of meaningful ongoing revenue streams resulting from the application of the technology. Why the BOD goes along with this isn’t understood.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.