InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: jcoukr post# 297039

Thursday, 01/12/2017 2:43:47 PM

Thursday, January 12, 2017 2:43:47 PM

Post# of 312009
imo it always is worth noting *patterns* ..

4 years ago .. when PTOI was last *illegally* manipulated UP .. i noted in this very venue contemporaneously
that overlapping CEs' *dilemma* then (that round had gotten underway with with *certain
aromatics* .. aka dirty whales entrance in 2012 and *clearly visible* patterns underway by Aug/Sept 2012)
was @ 1.50 to 1.65 .. so it came as no surprise that PTOI would be stopped out for that illegal *RUN* @ 1.49

on 5.1.13 .. overlapping CEs' utilized to decisively *break* PTOI sub 50c

in mid August 2013 .. P2O was *wrested back* and one month later .. current CEO would infuse *first of* $MILLION$

*overlapping CEs' response* .. (btw find any other OTC company whose CEO infused $MILLION$ and CEs'
cycle of money compresses vs running X ticker) .. was to take PTOI from 35c (9.30.13) to 10c .. EOY 2013 .. ;)

CEs' were already on the hook by EOY 2013 .. which left little room for anything but CONsistent compression of PTOI

some might remember our chatty CEO PROmoting the 5 and 10 NYSDEC Permits issued in the summer
of 2014 .. oh wait that never happened .. rather actual P2O investors' DD sourced that info

NYSDEC permits almost cost overlapping CEs .. they almost lost PTOI (from memory .. 19c almost breached 20c) ..
b4 *expending volume* to rein back in and restart the relentless resets via compression

each round since 9.30.13 .. reveals CEs' *weaknesses* .. CE isn't *retail* .. NON RETAIL is usually hard to *outlast*
when it comes to targeted OTC stox/co.s .. like PTOI/P2O

CEs' inability to do initial DD (2009 - 2010) re: P2O investors hasn't *changed* re: many of P2O's actual investors

if sells didn't come @ 35c (2013) .. and then 20c and then 10c and at 5c ..
do CEs' believe their ability to compress PTOI to 025 or 0125 is gonna generate *volume* .. ;)

it's also why the ACC Executive Summary was *buried* on back to back *volume* in October 2014 with a little help
(yet again) via LONDON CALLING

and it's why *volume* showed last on 12.23.16 .. the day after TMR's analyst report was issued noting
emerging sector .. realistic anticipated time lines and allocation of monies as measured .. $BILLION$

not exactly what overlapping CEs' algos wanted sourced .. ;)

what this actual P2O investor finds most *telling* .. is that P2O itself SURVIVED .. not only thru out the 3M
settlement which NN's NON RETAIL Bosses scooped imo about 80% vs *retails* 20% picks (throw a dart
either August 2015 start well into 2016 or 2016 in total) .. but mr. methodical and conservative's wording of the 3
2016 Shareholder Updates .. of which *imo* what SPECIFICALLY was actually reiterated by RH himself

so *patterns* show CEs' compression from 35c to 20c to 10c to 5c ..

all done from 9.30.13 to today ..


it's now a waiting game on P2O's ability to execute .. CEs' know it .. i know it .. all with interest know it

CEs' have limited options .. as noted earlier this week .. CEs' can try and do a CONtrolled *RUN* UP on PTOI
to 5c .. and pray like hell their rolling resets .. don't *coincide* with P2O's filing of a material event

CEs' can compress PTOI's PPS DOWN .. but they will actually lose *shares* to those multiple P2O investors with *bids* in the 02 to 03 PPS range ..

CEs' issue is .. the more they compress PTOI .. the less *factual* VOLUME is generated .. that translates to basic math

CEs' *CANT* get actual P2O investors to sell .. it's why PTOI has had less *volume* each successive year
since P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013


this is why i note that *overlapping* CEs are stuck ..

fine by me .. like many actual P2O investors with interest .. totally *content* to wait out and see P2O's *outcome*

and it is totally understandable why negative would outweigh either neutral or positive until P2O executes

i don't have an issue with YOY being *green* on low to no *volume* .. from now till current mgmt files either the DA
and/or ancillary material events .. and i certainly don't have an issue (caveats met) adding a few more .. if CEs'
make the price of PTOI .. just right .. :)

imo P2O has done something rather rare in the *deliberately* fungible OTC cesspool
they currently reside in .. P2O now *controls* what comes and when


i'm ok with that .. and clearly i'm not alone .. :)

4kids















10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --