InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 215
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2014

Re: drugmanrx post# 59463

Thursday, 01/12/2017 1:47:41 PM

Thursday, January 12, 2017 1:47:41 PM

Post# of 63558
What I was referring to was that Sandy indicated few of the SUNW investors are accredited. An accredited investor is defined precisely and offerings can be limited to accredited investors. You can lookup the requirements if you would like but basically for Sandy to make that statement truthfully he would have to know the household income for the past three years of each stockholder which he can't know unless he has committed a crime. The discounted direct shares that were offered on SLTDs web site required investors to be accredited. That does not preclude a company from stating they are looking for private capital and then eliminating non accredited investors who show interest from the pool. If Sandy were to do his research he would find that it was made public that SLTD was looking for funding. He also has no way of confirming the source of capital from Greg Boden. He has only implied without proof that the capital funding from Boden is from Boden's pockets only.

I am familiar with the tri counties area which includes Santa Barbara, I don't know any of the insiders involved with SLTD or SUNW. I do not comment on the investment worthiness of SUNW. What I primarily object to regarding Sandy's post are 1) massive amounts of research bias and 2) constant insinuation of illegal insider trading without actually explicitly calling it that or having the spine to do so in support of his research.