Tuesday, January 10, 2017 1:18:10 PM
On the merits, particularly the issue of standing, the appeal court did not at all sound receptive to the idea that Judge Davilla got something wrong. Google's argument seemed to go pretty much unchallenged, whereas MaxD had tough sailing on the alter ego theory.
So, I think the appeal will likely be dismissed (the judgment of Davilla affirmed) on this ground. The court may also make some comment on the question of whether the original (now defunct) agreement between VSL and MaxD including a license to the '339 patent at all, but this may be considered unnecessary.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Bulk Sample, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Sep 11, 2024 9:15 AM
One World Products Issues Shareholder Update Letter • OWPC • Sep 11, 2024 7:27 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Reports $1.225 Million in Revenue and $133,000 Net Profit for the Quarter • KGKG • Sep 10, 2024 1:30 PM