InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1148
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2013

Re: rhoyt post# 9958

Wednesday, 01/04/2017 10:52:53 AM

Wednesday, January 04, 2017 10:52:53 AM

Post# of 17079
That's not speculation; that's an opinion of something that is already in motion. He was speculating that Rohan would be arrested for insider trading - something that is not actually in motion - do you understand the difference?

And JAMN has no case against JAMN - did you read the lawsuit that the Marleys brought against JAMN? The license agreement is very clear - the license can be revoked if necessary. JAMN didn't pay the license fee for almost 2 years and they lost the relationship with Mother Parkers; they really damaged the Marley name with that blunder!

JAMN's entire position is that there was a "gentleman's agreement" about the license. Do you understand how courts work? Written trumps verbal every single time.