420 Property Mgmt. Inc. (FTPM)

[stervc]

Edited: FTPM**10 Facts vs Speculation

Below is an edited version of an earlier post that I made regarding FTPM that might be of use to help understand what truly could be in the mix if it is truly time for FTPM to begin releasing their much anticipated updates to us shareholders. Although I have made significant edits to FACT 10 to better be aligned with what is anticipated to be released from the company regarding their operations, I think reading and understanding Fact 1 through Fact 10 could be important for understanding what we could truly have here with FTPM:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125674671
Edited: FTPM**10 Facts vs Speculation

I think all research shared here within the forum should be respected regardless to who it’s from. Credible sources rest within the eye of the beholder. I think all should read and consider all FTPM posts pro and con and form their own decision based upon what each thinks.

Here with FTPM, there has been a fair amount of speculation for what can be transpiring and I have contributed towards some of that speculation, but let’s now focus on the 10 Facts below to better understand the magnitude of what could be forming right before our very eyes.

FACT 1
Within the market, especially the penny stock market, when you don’t have certain facts, you have no choice except to speculate as a family of investors or potential investors for what could be transpiring with a stock. Those electing not to do so should be respected for not sharing their thoughts just as of those who elect to share their thoughts should be respected too.

FACT 2
FTPM has gone current with their financials with OTC Markets not long ago, which normally a company would not pay the thousands of dollars to do so unless they have some kind of plan to ”positively” move forward:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FTPM/profile


FACT 3
FTPM has never been a shell. You can go back to their 10-Q filed back in 2011 and confirm such:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8267150

FACT 4
FTPM was approved by FINRA/SEC to change from its old name and old ticker to its new name of 420 Property Management, Inc. and new ticker FTPM:
http://420prop.com/420-property-management-announces-appointment-of-ceo-and-finra-approvals/

This new name and new ticker came with a change from its old operations to the new operations below within the Marijuana Industry:

http://420prop.com/our-portfolio/agricultural-properties/

FTPM to date, has already closed on seven properties in the Anza Valley of Southern California and in Perris, California ranging from 5 to 35 acres in size, with ample research and development space. This means a minimum amount of acres below as I will further elaborate:

Property 1 = 5 acres
Property 2 = ? acres
Property 3 = ? acres
Property 4 = ? acres
Property 5 = ? acres
Property 6 = ? acres
Property 7 = 35 acres

As a worst case scenario, the minimum amount of acres for properties 2 through 6 is 5 acres per property. This means a total of 30 acres for properties 2 through 6 and a total of 40 aces for properties 1 and 7 combined. This is a grand total of 70 acres minimum that FTPM has closed on in the Anza Valley of Southern California and in Perris, California for their lowest amount of acres to be considered as owned.

Now consider the 70 acres in relation to this article below which has concluded that 1 acre of land can generate $19 Million in Revenues from marijuana with almost all of it to be profit:

One Acre of Land Creates $19 Million in Revenues—Growing Marijuana
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/one-acre-of-land-creates-19-million-in-revenues-growing-marijuana/

I guess if this could hold true to FTPM having already on a minimum of 70 acres, then FTPM if they maximize such value per acre as mentioned within the article above, such would warrant…

70 Acres x $19,000,000 = $1,330,000,000 in Revenues

Again, per the article above, most of that would be profit (or Net Income).

By all means, I am not saying that FTPM is a billion dollar company because they would have to maximize each acre. However, I am saying that it would only take for FTPM to mature a ”small fraction” of what has been publicly deemed to be the maturation potential from their properties and I think one would conclude that FTPM is significantly undervalued here at these levels. Please, don’t shoot the messenger. I didn’t write the article. I am only considering the thoughts from the article in comparison to FTPM having already closed on at least 70 acres.

FTPM Industrial Properties:

http://420prop.com/our-portfolio/industrial-properties/

FACT 5
To give an important honorable mention, FTPM operates out of the state of California, but has plans to expand to Nevada, Colorado; and British Columbia, Canada:

http://420prop.com/about/company-profile/#top

FACT 6
Why would a company that is very profitable not consider merging into FTPM when they could save themselves from paying millions in taxes that would not exist otherwise. With FTPM having $35,412,165 available to be used as a 2 year carry back and 20 year carry forward Tax Net Operating Loss (NOL) to reduce the taxable income for a very profitable merging company’s future tax years. Read the post below to further understand how this would work:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=125397467

Regardless of a merger or not coming into FTPM, the company looks like it’s going to be very profitable just based on its current operations that I mentioned above.

FACT 7
The FTPM California portfolio consists of mixed use greenhouse structures for research and development, greenhouse structures for medicinal marijuana cultivation and unique greenhouse structures that include light deprivation techniques. Each property is utilized for year round growth, ensuring perpetual harvest for our clients.
http://420prop.com/our-portfolio/agricultural-properties/
(Scroll towards bottom of link above.)

FACT 8
The FTPM portfolio is not only in compliance with all municipal and state laws and regulations, it exceeds them. Each property meets the required high security standards with fencing, surveillance and monitoring systems. In addition, 420 Property Management provides the next generation in monitoring tools via real-time surveillance streaming and web app technologies.
http://420prop.com/our-portfolio/agricultural-properties/
(Scroll towards bottom of link above.)

Edited: FACT 9
The Outstanding Shares (OS) for FTPM was reported to be 617,183,845 shares as indicated within the filing below:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=FTPM&id=162741

The Authorized Shares (AS) is reported to be 2,000,000,000 shares as indicated below:
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/FTPM/profile

The Float was considered to have been some number significantly lower, but in my opinion, I think it’s fair to believe that some of the shares sold were previous shares that were restricted that became off of restriction to sell into the market. I spoke to the company a while back and the person I spoke to confirmed that there are no new conversions and said that any selling had to have been from old conversions from those deciding to sell their shares now. So far, the selling appears to have ceased as suspected.

This means that the Float has probably increased to somewhere in the area of the OS as a worst case scenario. Even if the Float is maxed out to be the same as the OS, I still believe that such would be a very fair share structure. To better understand why I say this, look at the share structures in some of the marijuana stocks below in the next section in comparison with the price of which where they all are trading to compare Market Caps.

FACT 10
Let’s ”compare and contrast” some Market Caps from some other marijuana stocks to FTPM as of Friday, Dec 30, 2016:

CGRW Market Cap = $181,690,713
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CGRW/profile

MJNA Market Cap = $576,569,356
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MJNA/profile

SGBY Market Cap = $22,770,766
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SGBY/profile

MCOA Market Cap = $125,878,240
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MCOA/profile

I can name a few more, but I like the potential for growth far more here in FTPM than those other stocks. No knock against those other stocks, but I am simply saying that FTPM is a little more undiscovered than those other marijuana stocks considering the Market Cap for FTPM to be only $1,049,213 as derived below and based on FTPM’s current operations that is known to exist within the company as explained above under Fact 4:

Market Cap = Share Price x Outstanding Shares (OS)

FTPM Market Cap = .0017 per share x 617,183,845 shares (OS) = $1,049,213 As of Dec 30, 2016

Here’s what this means even further… based on their Market Cap perspectives…



CGRW Market Cap ÷ FTPM Market Cap = Undervalued Difference
$181,690,713 ÷ $1,049,213 = Undervalued Difference
173.1 = Undervalued Difference

This means that FTPM is approximately 173 times undervalued compared to CGRW which could comparatively justify a fair price for FTPM as indicated below:

173 Undervalued Difference x .0017 FTPM Share price = .294 Per Share for FTPM Comparatively to CGRW



MJNA Market Cap ÷ FTPM Market Cap = Undervalued Difference
$576,569,356 ÷ $1,049,213 = Undervalued Difference
549.5 = Undervalued Difference

This means that FTPM is approximately 550 times undervalued compared to MJNA which could comparatively justify a fair price for FTPM as indicated below:

550 Undervalued Difference x .0017 FTPM Share price = .935 Per Share for FTPM Comparatively to MJNA



SGBY Market Cap ÷ FTPM Market Cap = Undervalued Difference
$22,770,766 ÷ $1,049,213 = Undervalued Difference
21.7 = Undervalued Difference

This means that FTPM is approximately 22 times undervalued compared to SGBY which could comparatively justify a fair price for FTPM as indicated below:

22 Undervalued Difference x .0017 FTPM Share price = .0374 Per Share for FTPM Comparatively to SGBY



MCOA Market Cap ÷ FTPM Market Cap = Undervalued Difference
$125,878,240 ÷ $1,049,213 = Undervalued Difference
119.9 = Undervalued Difference

This means that FTPM is approximately 120 times undervalued compared to MCOA which could comparatively justify a fair price for FTPM as indicated below:

120 Undervalued Difference x .0017 FTPM Share price = .204 Per Share for FTPM Comparatively to MCOA



I would like to close by saying that since I believe that FTPM appears to have more than what those other companies have, respectfully, then FTPM is truly undervalued here at these levels and is still yet to be discovered by the market. All they need to do is to start to tell their story that we all have been patiently waiting for.

v/r
Sterling