InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 495
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/15/2016

Re: garyhalvo post# 24380

Monday, 12/26/2016 7:20:55 PM

Monday, December 26, 2016 7:20:55 PM

Post# of 46515
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE RS IT HAS TO DO WITH IMPATIENT TRADERS / Investors and the time to the CAFC decisions

Your logic is incorrect - again for the last time;

1. Companies decline on RS due to shorting - proven highly unlikely here as stated prior

2. Companies Decline on RS due to shorting (if it happens see number 1) and anticipation of dilution. Traders and investors sell - again significant dilution is not applicable

3. A COMPLETELY UNRELATED ISSUE TO THE RS IS TIME TO A CATALYST / CAFC decision -could people sell bc of this? Sure but most likely already have. Those playing the pop to District Court bought prior and pushed the price, then dumped when it didn't happen. Long "investors" - many here, added.

As one can see from how the volume spiked after the CAFC PR and then subsequently decreased, those left for the most part are likely long term holders. Again, there may be few buyers - but if there are few sellers it's hard for the price to drop in half or worse as you claim

NUMBER THREE IS NOT CORRELATED TO THE RS - it is independent of the RS, time to the CAFC decision would have been an issue irrespective of the RS