Followers | 70 |
Posts | 5279 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/11/2014 |
Friday, December 23, 2016 3:20:44 PM
The person whose post I was responding to did
not post the name. .... It is fair to assume he/she
would have posted it publicly if they wanted to
I was respecting the poster's desires. . And I would
respect anyone's desire for privacy.
The names I revealed were law-breakers, & I was
forwarded the PRIVATE THRESHIE EMAILS by a
person who did not request that I keep the names
private.
Again, look at the post I was responding to, & you
will see that .the poster could have revealed . the
name - - - had that poster wanted to do so.
iHub does have expectations of privacy for posters
- - if the shill was an iHub poster, the name cannot
be revealed without violating the iHub TOS :
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/Terms.aspx
It is an extensive read and worth reading in full, IMO.
Until2017
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM