InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 2668
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/16/2013

Re: DrZem post# 39534

Saturday, 12/10/2016 11:58:26 AM

Saturday, December 10, 2016 11:58:26 AM

Post# of 97093
"But a speculation about which one was the cause is an opinion, not a fact."

In the absence of fact or truth,this is all we're left with.

So the highest probability deduction must suffice.

I don't really care why,I just know that there were sellers. Sellers who were quick to pull the trigger,so quick not to of even waited around long enuff to see if the rise on "good news" would produce larger fruit.

What this tells me is that those that sold were either more than happy to get an extra penny or two on their Nickel or less shares(those issued shares directly by DECN) or these were owners who simply saw "liquidity" and looked for an exit,what's ironic is that it's at a time when the prospects for DECN "couldn't be brighter"(?).

If DECN "struggles to get to 14 cents on a $17 million contract,what does that tell you,from a big picture standpoint?


Scoop