Apple Inc (AAPL)

[atenza]

Your translation part is correct, I mean, Samsung just copied a FEW things, like one or two, so it doesnt have to forfeit all its profits.

So, if Apple did the same thing, its the SCUM of the earth. By the way, I dont think Samsung is a little guy that Apple won 1 billion dollars from back in 2012, or are they?

Heres another new lawsuit against Samsung by KAIST University (the most well known university in South Korea)for stealing patents.

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/187751/20161205/samsung-gets-sued-over-finfet-technology-patent-infringement-lawsuit-to-delay-galaxy-s8-launch.htm

I love Samsung still. But I just love Apple more. With all these lawsuits going on with Samsung, I still dont think they're the scum of the earth. Business is business.

Here you go, sticky this.

The court was not asked to weigh in on whether Samsung actually violated various Apple design patents. Instead, the court ruled it's possible a design patent only covers part of a product rather than all of it.
Translation: Just because a company's product copies one or two features from a competitor doesn't necessarily mean it has to forfeit all of that product's profits to its competitor.
The case now goes back to a lower court where the two companies will once again take up the issue of how much Samsung should pay in damages for copying iPhone features.
"It's clearly a victory for Samsung," says Michael Risch, a patent law professor at Villanova University. "How big a victory remains to be seen."