Thanks for your response and opinion.
Most every one agrees that the current team has to change, even radically. And this to satisfy the needs of all: the need for good communication and openness, the need for clear company vision (instead of changing directions like a weathervane), the need for action rather than slow motion, the need for a team where all members have solid science awareness, and others…
The problem with granting stock resides behind the scene. Investors can’t make a logical choice without knowing facts: What are the current company transactions going on currently that need financing to bring them to completion, if any?
Our wish of course is for a vote after the meeting, not before, when cards can be put on the table, and when shareholders present could report back to us all.
