InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 84
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/12/2013

Re: ken_r post# 44306

Monday, 12/05/2016 11:48:32 AM

Monday, December 05, 2016 11:48:32 AM

Post# of 47873
You ask why we think that the Courts would consider our asking that PP investors get screwed more than IMSC investors. I think that you are missing the point that PP investors were lured in (like most ultra-greedy so-called investors in classic ponzi schemes) by rates of return to good to be true. No one should have the right to get back the ROI built into the toxic and usurious deal PP was getting .... 15, 16, 17%, ... 8 cent conversions when the stock was valued above $1.00 etc.... so, like most investors in ponzi schemes .. they should be entitled to and expect to take a haircut vs. what they may have been promised by the white-collar criminals running the enterprise.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.