InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 168
Posts 21361
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2006

Re: headsortails2066 post# 2803

Monday, 12/05/2016 7:54:11 AM

Monday, December 05, 2016 7:54:11 AM

Post# of 191931
Not that it really makes that much difference, but the PE uses Earnings as opposed to Revenues. So, .31 instead of .50, only 14x your money for a PE of 5. But there's NO WAY this would have a PE of just 5 if they have earnings of $31m next year. The PE would be north of 50.

Valuation calcs are through the roof here no matter what approach one takes, based on the projections made. The projections are so incredible that it seems most people prefer to apply some small percentage to them, and even if you apply only 1/10 - 10% - to the numbers they still calculate to great returns.

But, there's a crowd that simply won't believe any of it until there is more evidence on the table that they will actually be able to bring in ANY revenue at all.

I can appreciate that view, and until then what will drive the stock, I think, is the ever growing story here of the many applications COMBINED with closing in on a number of the catalysts: Sing movie, Caught on Tape, Matrix Group signups, RadioShack rollout.

On top of that we have a recent increase in exposure to new investors via articles - perhaps through the IR firm outreach that FINALLY is heating up after months of anticipation. It looks like it is now beginning. Probably not by coincidence.

JMO, but THIS is the time to give a close look here.






For microcap opportunities in the hot Virtual Reality sector, see my board

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VERB News