InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 5112
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/22/2012

Re: None

Friday, 12/02/2016 2:01:12 PM

Friday, December 02, 2016 2:01:12 PM

Post# of 129597
We're all frustrated to say the least. They apparently feel they have a strong request for a rehearing based on 'missapprended or overlooked' claims. The conflict of interest with the judges is something that will probably best be used in any appeal, God forbid VPLM loses the IPR trial. Just imagine going through the trial and negotiating with Apple and just hinting that if we do lose the trial, we're just going to appeal on grounds of the conflict of interest. Which would certainly go in VPLM's favor. It's actually a good wildcard, IMHO it's debatable the judges would be bias enough to rule in Apples favor to institute. They boggled them with countles claims that confused them into wanting to review more with a trial. We're all confident VPLM will win. It's just the time that it's going to take.

Hopefully, in two months, they'll be granted a rehearing and their response to the PTAB will impress UP and Apple and show them even more how strong our case is and initiates an offer. Settlement is what this has come down to.

Remember these attorneys aren't naive and or stupid, they know whether or not, our Patents are valid or not. It's all right out in front of everyone to see. They're just playing the Tap, tap tapping game. But, as Emil said, he wouldn't take anything less than $2 Billion plus, BEFORE litigation.