![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/81790.png?cb=1687774840)
Thursday, December 01, 2016 11:40:18 PM
Valuation thoughts:
Adjust downward for revenues, where appropriate. 175 employees is a good sized company, $48m revenue estimates by those who do that for a living are IMO probably in the ballpark, as it falls within a reasonable 150k - 350k per employee range that is found in similar industries.
From various posters here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbyboard.aspx?boardID=27000&srchyr=2016&SearchStr=valuation
[.156]
<<The only thing we have for valuation is P/S ratio
If we assume 60M revenues and assuming PS ratio of around 6x which I consider fairly conservative for the industry, I'm getting a price of around 0.156
But it doesn't take into account the growth potential of the Company. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126937645&txt2find=valuation
[.50-$1 pre 1 for 100 RS]
<<$50-$100 after RS. why?. The float would be super tiny after the RS. The revenue of $48M or $70M is just a starter and don't matter. The PROJECTED GROWTH RATE is what counts for valuation. I value startups on a regular basis.
Even at $50M Rev, 10x of that puts the market cap at $500M. 20x of that puts it $1B. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126937059&txt2find=valuation
[.04-.16]
<<Pixelmags today is worth somewhere between $0,04 and $0,16, as detailed below.
Comps in the same industry with market cap under 500M$ have a range of sales multiples between 5x and 10x. For the sake of prudence, lets assume Pixelmags warrant sales multiple between 3x and 6x.
3x Sales
Revenues 25M$ = $0,0409
Revenues 50M$ = $0,0818
6x Sales
Revenues 25M$ = $0,0818
Revenues 50M$ = $0,1637>>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126936862&txt2find=valuation
[.17 pre 1 for 100 RS, and using $66m revs]
<<PIXL's post RM valuation S/B $17.00...
To value PIXL ... I used Shutterstock's sales multiple and other financial metrics WHEN THEY IPO'd in late 2012. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126723701
[1.08]
<<low estimates 1.8bill is 1 mill cap at .018
therefore 60 mill revenue at 1xPeg is 60 x .018
and most companies on nasdaq trade greater than 1xPEG
so conservatively if merger happens. 1.08 BEFORE split..
not counting the reverse for nasdaq
not counting a greater than 1x valuation of PEG.>>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126842541&txt2find=valuation
[.104-.30+]
<<In short I'm trying to say that PixelMags will perform two or three times better than Shutterstock! My guess is Pixel will see $120 to $150 a share at some point in the foreseeable future.
This whole post was written on the premise that confirmation of the Reverse Merger hits BEFORE the reverse split of SPCL....
If we take yearly revs of $48 million & divide that by the 1.83 billion shares we have a value of .026 which is more than 10 times our current PPS of .002
If someone tried to calculate value "based on 4x or 9x for industry standard for revenue" they're referring to the P/E Ratio,,, 4x being very, very conservative, 9x being a little above conservative. Keep in mind that when a company is the leader in their sector with very little competition I would really have to use a P/E of 8x MINIMUM
We will continue to stick with 4x P/E to avoid being overly optimistic. We will also stay with $48 million because that's what we know was reported to the SEC even though there's rumors we're now closer to $60 million. No need what so ever to hype this stock. The SEC reported FACTS are all the hype this thing needs.
4x Price per Earnings with PPS of .026 gives us a value of .104 based on current SS.
What's nice is this. This $48 million followed a year of $30 million which presents us with revenue growth of over 60%. In addition, if now we're in the $60 million range that's another 20% growth before a full year has elapsed. I don't need to tell you the obvious. This has demonstrated dramatic growth for several years running. Wall Street takes this information to project future earnings growth. It will continue to grow because Pixel is presently almost alone in this sector of up-loading magazine content directly from the source & they are the undisputed leader.
So the way they calculate this Positive Guidance would be a "PEG Ratio" (basically an Earnings Growth ratio) This is where we could see this thing run huge.
If Pixel gives us positive guidance in their quarterly people would do the math reach calculations of .25 to maybe .35 (still very conservative) which would give this thing an easy run to .30 & if there's really a lot of excitement we can't rule out a momentum run to .45 or more. Don't let Analysts give this a value of 9x P/E or above,,, I won't even fill your head with projections for that. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126718914
Adjust downward for revenues, where appropriate. 175 employees is a good sized company, $48m revenue estimates by those who do that for a living are IMO probably in the ballpark, as it falls within a reasonable 150k - 350k per employee range that is found in similar industries.
From various posters here:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbyboard.aspx?boardID=27000&srchyr=2016&SearchStr=valuation
[.156]
<<The only thing we have for valuation is P/S ratio
If we assume 60M revenues and assuming PS ratio of around 6x which I consider fairly conservative for the industry, I'm getting a price of around 0.156
But it doesn't take into account the growth potential of the Company. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126937645&txt2find=valuation
[.50-$1 pre 1 for 100 RS]
<<$50-$100 after RS. why?. The float would be super tiny after the RS. The revenue of $48M or $70M is just a starter and don't matter. The PROJECTED GROWTH RATE is what counts for valuation. I value startups on a regular basis.
Even at $50M Rev, 10x of that puts the market cap at $500M. 20x of that puts it $1B. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126937059&txt2find=valuation
[.04-.16]
<<Pixelmags today is worth somewhere between $0,04 and $0,16, as detailed below.
Comps in the same industry with market cap under 500M$ have a range of sales multiples between 5x and 10x. For the sake of prudence, lets assume Pixelmags warrant sales multiple between 3x and 6x.
3x Sales
Revenues 25M$ = $0,0409
Revenues 50M$ = $0,0818
6x Sales
Revenues 25M$ = $0,0818
Revenues 50M$ = $0,1637>>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126936862&txt2find=valuation
[.17 pre 1 for 100 RS, and using $66m revs]
<<PIXL's post RM valuation S/B $17.00...
To value PIXL ... I used Shutterstock's sales multiple and other financial metrics WHEN THEY IPO'd in late 2012. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126723701
[1.08]
<<low estimates 1.8bill is 1 mill cap at .018
therefore 60 mill revenue at 1xPeg is 60 x .018
and most companies on nasdaq trade greater than 1xPEG
so conservatively if merger happens. 1.08 BEFORE split..
not counting the reverse for nasdaq
not counting a greater than 1x valuation of PEG.>>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126842541&txt2find=valuation
[.104-.30+]
<<In short I'm trying to say that PixelMags will perform two or three times better than Shutterstock! My guess is Pixel will see $120 to $150 a share at some point in the foreseeable future.
This whole post was written on the premise that confirmation of the Reverse Merger hits BEFORE the reverse split of SPCL....
If we take yearly revs of $48 million & divide that by the 1.83 billion shares we have a value of .026 which is more than 10 times our current PPS of .002
If someone tried to calculate value "based on 4x or 9x for industry standard for revenue" they're referring to the P/E Ratio,,, 4x being very, very conservative, 9x being a little above conservative. Keep in mind that when a company is the leader in their sector with very little competition I would really have to use a P/E of 8x MINIMUM
We will continue to stick with 4x P/E to avoid being overly optimistic. We will also stay with $48 million because that's what we know was reported to the SEC even though there's rumors we're now closer to $60 million. No need what so ever to hype this stock. The SEC reported FACTS are all the hype this thing needs.
4x Price per Earnings with PPS of .026 gives us a value of .104 based on current SS.
What's nice is this. This $48 million followed a year of $30 million which presents us with revenue growth of over 60%. In addition, if now we're in the $60 million range that's another 20% growth before a full year has elapsed. I don't need to tell you the obvious. This has demonstrated dramatic growth for several years running. Wall Street takes this information to project future earnings growth. It will continue to grow because Pixel is presently almost alone in this sector of up-loading magazine content directly from the source & they are the undisputed leader.
So the way they calculate this Positive Guidance would be a "PEG Ratio" (basically an Earnings Growth ratio) This is where we could see this thing run huge.
If Pixel gives us positive guidance in their quarterly people would do the math reach calculations of .25 to maybe .35 (still very conservative) which would give this thing an easy run to .30 & if there's really a lot of excitement we can't rule out a momentum run to .45 or more. Don't let Analysts give this a value of 9x P/E or above,,, I won't even fill your head with projections for that. >>
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=126718914
For microcap opportunities in the hot Virtual Reality sector, see my board
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.